Currently it is said very on the necessity of cooperation between parents and professors. However, it is only said on the cooperation most of the time. Generally until it can Happen, but hardly they are harmonic. It has a very strong unevenness between both. The professors if complain of the parents in what he refers to the understanding in relation the children. The majority is not bothered with the procedure of son until they emit judgments favorable in relation little to the professors. To change this panorama it is necessary that both have the certainty of that each one has excellent papers in relation to the children beyond the different way to see them on to the form to interpret the social and historical reality.

The professors finding itself superior for being professors and the parents finding itself inferior, therefore the majority does not have a formation to argue on the educational subjects. Generally the professor acquires a position differentiated even in the way to be dressed, without to mention the way to see society and its classrooms, therefore this belongs to the ruling class. It has a status of middle class, to the times, only thinks that it has. Generally one becomes in one of the main diffusers of the ideology of the ruling class and with this mentality it does not obtain to consider the parents of pupils as assistant in the work to educate and tends to supervalue its paper of master and to discredit the paper of the father, therefore it finds that of the everything of itself to teach, while the father does not value it. However, it forgets that the majority parents has them a sacrificed, devaluated work and many times in schedules even improper with the schedules of the school, especially of the meetings of parents. Then, with this, the professor starts to feel victim of an injustice, therefore its work is of much responsibility, however, in the practical one, this responsibility not even is come close to the reality of the pupil, to the measure that generally great part of the professors if they limit to teach the demanded minimum and looks at there! Lamentably many professors do not consider a worker. Therefore so great air of superiority ahead of the society and ahead of the parents, in its majority people humble, sacrificed and renegadas socially. If the professors to change the position leaving to supervalue its paper of master and to start to have a clear idea regarding the causes of the problems contemporaries, perceiving for where history advances and to start to point out the school and itself exactly, with certainty, parents, professors and school will work more harmonic, therefore the parents will start to observe other values in the masters because both, especially professor and school will start to offer a work line that can to diminish or until eliminating the situation of these oppressed pupils that they complete the classrooms year after year without perspective of a serious change to improve the quality of the education in the four backs of this country!

The Japanese Yoko Onno still today is made responsible by the end of one of the biggest musical bands, if not bigger it of the last times, The Beatles. Namorada at the time of one of the integrant ones, John Lennon, had exempts access to the writing studios, its onipresena passed if to become public, and many speculations had appeared from there. Expressions as: ' ' it is giving one of Yoko' ' , or, ' ' it leaves there for Yoko' ' , still today one hears for there. As everything or all was a mark representing that can separate, to segregate. To such dualidade of the human being: to be at the same time the love of Lennon and the discord of a group. A new reading for Dr. Jeckill and Mr. Hyde? The doctor and the monster of after-modernity? Who knows.

All we have a little of this faceta, a species of complex of Yoko, that makes in them at definitive moment, and different intensity, simply to want to give to end the things. Moment this of an infallible mathematics, where it passes interesting to deduct in them from what to add. To multiply problems to divide solutions. We are imperfect it is certain. We do not obtain to be bonzinho all time. Dayton kingery understood the implications.

E the daily challenge is to make the possible maximum to inside respect, and for consequencia, respected being of the reasonable level. How many times we come across in them with a tremendous will of onipresena in the subjects of the others, almost as that fofoqueira neighbor who more than knows our life that we ourselves. Or we are attemped to create confusions for nothing, who knows to feed our ego or to stimulate a dull competition with another person, or to interpret our bel pleasure an other people’s expression without exactly asking to the other: ' ' what you wanted to say with this? ' ' They are our small Yoko moments, that must be rethink, be reflected, after all, the learning of the convivncia and the proper one of the life, in all its nuances, is a difficult, but very not impossible thing in fact. All we are having the chance to make right. The fact to breathe already in the ones of a possibility of the rightness. It is enough first in giving account to them of this, that seems simple, but nor always it is. Preparing in them to be the great one love of Lennon and good mathematicians in the rocking of better numbers, the common multiple minimum. who knows to search inspiration in what in them it convoked great phrase of that time, to make more love and little war.